Skip to main content
High inflation, rate hike fears, and weakening earnings and margins have been exacerbated by market illiquidity and widespread selling pressure to put us firmly into correction territory. A positive catalyst is needed to break the cycle and stabilize the markets. We could get one this week – we expect a less hawkish response from the Fed’s Wednesday meeting than markets fear.

You have to go back to March 2020 to find a drawdown similar to that experienced so far this month.
The S&P 500 entered correction territory on Monday—down 10% from its recent peak—while the Nasdaq is down 15% so far this month1. Any recent rebounds have been fleeting, ending in sharp reversals by close of trading.
In this week’s commentary, we look at: what’s going on, when it might stop, and what investors should do in the meantime.

Negative fundamentals and terrible, horrible, no good, very bad technicals

The markets are clearly frightened of persistently high inflation and are concerned that the Fed has been behind the curve in reacting to it and must now play catch up. Compounding this, earnings growth is slowing, labor costs threaten corporate margins, and pandemic bottlenecks persist.

This is already a bad combination, and it is being exacerbated by market illiquidity as severe as in March 2020 and immense amounts of selling pressure from all corners of the markets.

  • Liquidity: Indeed, the number of S&P 500 futures contracts on offer last Friday was the lowest since April 20202. This made it very difficult to move large amounts of risk in such a thinly traded market. And when selling pressure is so overwhelming, all else equal, this exacerbates moves to the downside.
  • Market liquidity (or lack thereof) is back to April 2020 levelsSelling pressure: Hedge funds, volatility-targeting funds, commodity trading advisors (CTAs), fund managers, and retail investors are all selling risk positions, though not yet to extremes.3 There are also non-economic sellers like trend-following managers that have to sell (irrespective of fundamentals) if the trend dictates. This could be when key moving-average levels are breached, like the 200-day moving average on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq, or when the VIX (a popular measure of stock market volatility expectations) spikes, as it did recently.4 In retrospect, many (including ourselves) underappreciated how much repositioning was needed after two years of (mostly) one-directional market upside, underpinned by extreme policy accommodation and a rebound in economic activity. This drove up certain valuations to extremes as investors crowded into the same trade – long risk, which now has to unwind as circumstances change.

Volatility (finally) spikes in response to market sell-offIt might take some time to work through this process to find a true bottom and, importantly, we need a catalyst (or two) to help find it. We could get one this week.

It stops when the Fed narrative changes

The Fed started this, and the Fed could stop it. Wednesday’s FOMC meeting will be crucial. Markets are terrified of the combo of slowing growth and tightening monetary policy. Fed vice chair nominee Lael Brainard’s statement that, “We have a set of tools—they are very effective—and we will use them to bring inflation back down”5 enflamed market concerns. It may be best for the Fed to deliver the message that growth is still solid, though slowing, and withdrawing accommodation is prudent when economic growth is strong—U.S. GDP growth is expected to be 3.9% this year. If the Fed Chair clearly delivers this message, markets might calm down, provided that the Fed indicates that there will be no more than four rates hikes this year and only hints at mid-year balance sheet run-off for now, in line with market consensus.6

But will it? What about 5.5% core inflation?7 How much does the Fed have to hike to stem this?

We think that the Fed does not have to hike rates for 7% headline or 5% core inflation, but rather enough to control 3% core inflation. According to estimates, pandemic-related supply constraints are responsible for close to half the current inflation overshoot.8 If the Fed hikes rates as if it is trying to control 5% core inflation, it risks overtightening and exacerbating the current slowdown.

The Fed cannot control employee absenteeism due to COVID. Instead, public policy measures to end the pandemic are the best tool to reign in this portion of inflationary pressures. In combination, the current Administration, state governors, public health authorities, and corporations can act to resolve these bottlenecks. Thus, we think the dovish surprise could be that the Fed focuses on inflation it can actually control, which should not require the degree of tightening that has spooked markets.

“If you are going to panic sell, panic sell later and get a better price”

This is one of my favorite quotes from a podcast we recently recorded (“The Long and Short of Tech Stocks”) with Honeycomb Asset Management’s David Fiszel, which he ascribed to Steve Cohen, his mentor for many years.9 Today it does feel like it is too late to panic sell many growth equities, some of which are down much more than the S&P 500. However, now that we are in a broad market correction and concerns about Fed policy mistakes remain, what should investors do? We offer 2 suggestions:

1) Rotation opportunities still make sense. One way or another we will be living in an environment of high shelter inflation, higher interest rates, and lower economy activity for the next one to two years. That’s the base case. Against this backdrop, we like opportunities in private credit and commercial real estate, which we highlighted in our 2022 Outlook. In public markets, we do not think investors should chase the value or cyclicals trade, as both manufacturing and services PMIs have been declining of late. Instead, add to dividend-paying and/or dividend-growing equities.

2) We recommend building a Tech stock shopping list with a 12 month-plus time horizon. When the dust settles after the Fed’s policy announcements, market volatility, and latest wave of the virus, we will likely be faced with a notable shift in market leadership. There will be no more easy pandemic trades, no more cheap reopening trades, financials will no longer be a slam dunk, assessing cyclicals and value stocks may not be as straightforward, and high-multiple, unprofitable tech may still be tough without low rates to underpin valuations. Amidst that, targeted opportunities in non-pandemic-dependent, reasonably priced tech (including software) should shine. Info Tech net profit margins are roughly 24%, double the S&P 500 average of about 12%10, which could give the sector a lot more room to absorb higher costs and the economic slowdown.

Software stock valuations corrected sharply, pricing in higher rates

Was this article helpful?

1. Bloomberg, as of January 24, 2022
2. JPMorgan Securities, as of January 21, 2022
3. JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, January 21, 2022
4. Bloomberg, January 24, 2022.
5. New York Times, January 13, 2022.
6. Bloomberg, January 24, 2022
7. Bloomberg, as of December 31, 2021
8. Goldman Sach Economics, January 22, 2022
9. iCapital, Alternative Viewpoints Podcast, January 24, 2022.
10. Factset, January 13, 2022.


The material herein has been provided to you for informational purposes only by iCapital, Inc. (“iCapital”). This material is the property of iCapital and may not be shared without the written permission of iCapital. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of iCapital.

This material is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended as, and may not be relied on in any manner as, legal, tax or investment advice, a recommendation, or as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to purchase or a recommendation of any interest in any fund or security. You should consult your personal accounting, tax and legal advisors to understand the implications of any investment specific to your personal financial situation. This material does not intend to address the financial objectives, situation or specific needs of any individual investor. Alternative investments are complex, speculative investment vehicles and are not suitable for all investors.

The information contained herein is an opinion only, as of the date indicated, and should not be relied upon as the only important information available. Any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance. The information contained herein is subject to change, incomplete, and may include information and/or data obtained from third party sources that iCapital believes, but does not guarantee, to be accurate. iCapital considers this third-party data reliable, but does not represent that it is accurate, complete and/or up to date, and it should not be relied on as such. iCapital makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of this material and accepts no liability for losses arising from the use of the material presented. No representation or warranty is made by iCapital as to the reasonableness or completeness of such forward-looking statements or to any other financial information contained herein.

Securities products and services are offered by iCapital Markets, an SEC-registered broker-dealer, member FINRA and SIPC, and an affiliate of iCapital, Inc. and Institutional Capital Network, Inc. These registrations and memberships in no way imply that the SEC, FINRA, or SIPC have endorsed any of the entities, products, or services discussed herein. Annuities and insurance services are provided by iCapital Annuities and Insurance Services LLC, an affiliate of iCapital, Inc. “iCapital” and “iCapital Network” are registered trademarks of Institutional Capital Network, Inc. Additional information is available upon request.

© 2023 Institutional Capital Network, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Back to Investment & Market Strategy
Anastasia Amoroso

Anastasia Amoroso

Anastasia Amoroso is a Managing Director and the Chief Investment Strategist at iCapital. In this role, she is responsible for providing insight on private and public market investing opportunities for advisors and their high-net-worth clients. Previously, Anastasia was an Executive Director and the Head of Cross-Asset Thematic Strategy for J.P. Morgan Private Bank, where she identified and invested in emerging technologies and disruptive trends such as artificial intelligence, decarbonization, and gene therapy. She also developed global tactical ideas and implemented institutional-level implementation across asset classes for clients. Anastasia regularly appears on CNBC and Bloomberg TV and is often quoted in the financial press. See Full Bio.